Match statistics snapshot
- Haugesund created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 0.58, Δ 0.51).
- Haugesund fired more attempts (15 vs 4 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.58 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 450Lead | Accurate passes | 355 |
| 542Lead | Total passes | 459 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |