Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 1.31, Δ 0.35).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Haugesund was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 417Lead | Accurate passes | 362 |
| 504Lead | Total passes | 419 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.