Match statistics snapshot
- Molde created the clearer chances on xG (1.24 vs 3.29, Δ 2.05).
- Molde fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- Haugesund was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 1.24 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.29Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 414Lead | Accurate passes | 286 |
| 511Lead | Total passes | 366 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |