Match statistics snapshot
- Haugesund was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 40%).
- Moss held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Moss |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Moss |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 292 | Accurate passes | 352Lead |
| 383 | Total passes | 446Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Moss |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Moss |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Moss |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |