Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 1.80, Δ 0.43).
- Haugesund fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Haugesund was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.80Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 432 | Accurate passes | 452Lead |
| 503 | Total passes | 530Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Haugesund | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.