Match statistics snapshot
- Rangers created the clearer chances on xG (0.75 vs 0.82, Δ 0.07).
- Rangers fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Heart Of Midlothian was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Heart Of Midlothian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 0.75 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Heart Of Midlothian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 317Lead |
| 299 | Total passes | 417Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Heart Of Midlothian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Heart Of Midlothian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -1.14 | Goals prevented | -1.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Heart Of Midlothian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |