Match statistics snapshot
- Heart Of Midlothian fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Rosenborg was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
- Rosenborg held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Heart Of Midlothian | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Heart Of Midlothian | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 267 | Accurate passes | 350Lead |
| 362 | Total passes | 446Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Heart Of Midlothian | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Heart Of Midlothian | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Heart Of Midlothian | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |