Match statistics snapshot
- Hebar 1918 created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 0.81, Δ 0.23).
- Hebar 1918 fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- CSKA 1948 was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hebar 1918 | Statistic | Cska 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hebar 1918 | Statistic | Cska 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 320Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 394Lead | Total passes | 311 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hebar 1918 | Statistic | Cska 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hebar 1918 | Statistic | Cska 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hebar 1918 | Statistic | Cska 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.