Match statistics snapshot
- Hebar 1918 created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 0.24, Δ 0.93).
- Hebar 1918 held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hebar 1918 | Statistic | Etar Veliko Tarnovo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.24 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 1 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hebar 1918 | Statistic | Etar Veliko Tarnovo |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 277Lead | Accurate passes | 243 |
| 335Lead | Total passes | 314 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hebar 1918 | Statistic | Etar Veliko Tarnovo |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hebar 1918 | Statistic | Etar Veliko Tarnovo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hebar 1918 | Statistic | Etar Veliko Tarnovo |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.