Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen created the clearer chances on xG (3.45 vs 0.84, Δ 2.61).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Heerenveen was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3.45Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.84 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 325Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 430Lead | Total passes | 373 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Almere City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.