Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 0.73, Δ 0.47).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (20 vs 3 shots).
- FC Volendam was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Fc Volendam |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.73 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Fc Volendam |
|---|---|---|
| 77%Lead | Ball possession | 23% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 635Lead | Accurate passes | 137 |
| 715Lead | Total passes | 227 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Fc Volendam |
|---|---|---|
| 19Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Fc Volendam |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Fc Volendam |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |