Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen created the clearer chances on xG (2.60 vs 1.72, Δ 0.88).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Heerenveen was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nac Breda |
|---|---|---|
| 2.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nac Breda |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 474Lead | Accurate passes | 257 |
| 556Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nac Breda |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nac Breda |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -1.05 | Goals prevented | -1.05 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nac Breda |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.