Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 32%).
- Heerenveen held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 545Lead | Accurate passes | 192 |
| 620Lead | Total passes | 281 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.