Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen created the clearer chances on xG (2.81 vs 0.94, Δ 1.87).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 2.81Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 206 | Accurate passes | 383Lead |
| 304 | Total passes | 470Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.39 | Goals prevented | -0.39 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.