Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen created the clearer chances on xG (1.66 vs 0.68, Δ 0.98).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Heerenveen was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 1.66Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| Offsides | ||
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 319 | Accurate passes | 370Lead |
| 398 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.