Match statistics snapshot
- Vitesse created the clearer chances on xG (1.80 vs 2.01, Δ 0.21).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (22 vs 16 shots).
- Vitesse was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 1.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.01Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 14 | Shots inside the box | 14 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 347Lead | Accurate passes | 315 |
| 426Lead | Total passes | 393 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Heerenveen | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.