Match statistics snapshot
- Helmond Sport created the clearer chances on xG (0.37 vs 0.04, Δ 0.33).
- Waalwijk fired more attempts (3 vs 1 shots).
- Helmond Sport was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 67%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Helmond Sport | Statistic | Waalwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 0.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.04 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Total shots | 3Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Helmond Sport | Statistic | Waalwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 46 | Accurate passes | 122Lead |
| 67 | Total passes | 143Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Helmond Sport | Statistic | Waalwijk |
|---|---|---|
| Corner kicks |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Helmond Sport | Statistic | Waalwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.17 | Goals prevented | -0.17 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Helmond Sport | Statistic | Waalwijk |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Fouls | 2 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |