Match statistics snapshot
- GIF Sundsvall created the clearer chances on xG (1.39 vs 1.58, Δ 0.19).
- Helsingborg was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Helsingborg | Statistic | Gif Sundsvall |
|---|---|---|
| 1.39 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Helsingborg | Statistic | Gif Sundsvall |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 359 | Accurate passes | 364Lead |
| 432 | Total passes | 447Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Helsingborg | Statistic | Gif Sundsvall |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Helsingborg | Statistic | Gif Sundsvall |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Helsingborg | Statistic | Gif Sundsvall |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.