Match statistics snapshot
- Helsingborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.85 vs 1.68, Δ 0.17).
- IK brage fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- IK brage was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Helsingborg | Statistic | Ik Brage |
|---|---|---|
| 1.85Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.68 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Helsingborg | Statistic | Ik Brage |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 309 | Accurate passes | 501Lead |
| 376 | Total passes | 581Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Helsingborg | Statistic | Ik Brage |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Helsingborg | Statistic | Ik Brage |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Helsingborg | Statistic | Ik Brage |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |