Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 1.43, Δ 0.26).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Heerenveen was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Heracles | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Heracles | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 338 | Accurate passes | 340Lead |
| 399 | Total passes | 406Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Heracles | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Heracles | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Heracles | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |