Match statistics snapshot
- Hertha BSC fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Hertha BSC was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 10%).
- 1.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hertha Bsc | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hertha Bsc | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 328 | Accurate passes | 395Lead |
| 396 | Total passes | 474Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hertha Bsc | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hertha Bsc | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hertha Bsc | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |