Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- HFX Wanderers FC was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 13%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hfx Wanderers Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hfx Wanderers Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 258 | Accurate passes | 413Lead |
| 348 | Total passes | 491Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hfx Wanderers Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hfx Wanderers Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hfx Wanderers Fc | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |