Match statistics snapshot
- Hibernian created the clearer chances on xG (2.14 vs 0.63, Δ 1.51).
- Kilmarnock fired more attempts (11 vs 5 shots).
- Hibernian was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 2.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.63 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 387Lead | Accurate passes | 349 |
| 473Lead | Total passes | 417 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.30 | Goals prevented | -0.30 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |