Match statistics snapshot
- Hibernian created the clearer chances on xG (1.38 vs 0.47, Δ 0.91).
- Hibernian was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.38Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.47 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 2Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 348 | Accurate passes | 382Lead |
| 423 | Total passes | 446Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.