Match statistics snapshot
- Hibernian created the clearer chances on xG (1.54 vs 0.18, Δ 1.36).
- Hibernian fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Hibernian was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.54Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.18 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 260 | Accurate passes | 342Lead |
| 318 | Total passes | 405Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hibernian | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.