Match statistics snapshot
- HJK Helsinki created the clearer chances on xG (2.53 vs 0.97, Δ 1.56).
- HJK Helsinki fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- HJK Helsinki was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hjk Helsinki | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 2.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97 |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hjk Helsinki | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 530Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 596Lead | Total passes | 326 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hjk Helsinki | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hjk Helsinki | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hjk Helsinki | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.