Match statistics snapshot
- HJK Helsinki created the clearer chances on xG (2.12 vs 1.07, Δ 1.05).
- HJK Helsinki fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Ilves was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Hjk Helsinki | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 2.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.07 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Hjk Helsinki | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 88% |
| 615Lead | Accurate passes | 424 |
| 689Lead | Total passes | 484 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Hjk Helsinki | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Hjk Helsinki | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Hjk Helsinki | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.