Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 1.23, Δ 0.14).
- 1.
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Holstein Kiel | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.23Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Holstein Kiel | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 242 | Accurate passes | 305Lead |
| 329 | Total passes | 389Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Holstein Kiel | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Holstein Kiel | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.12 | Goals prevented | 0.12 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Holstein Kiel | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |