Match statistics snapshot
- Barnsley fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Barnsley was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 25%).
- Barnsley held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Horsham | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Horsham | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 290 | Accurate passes | 415Lead |
| 415 | Total passes | 526Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Horsham | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Horsham | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Horsham | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |