Match statistics snapshot
- Houston Dash W fired more attempts (27 vs 13 shots).
- Angel City W was more accurate in front of goal (77% on target vs 37%).
- Angel City W held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 10 | Shots on target | 10 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 225 | Accurate passes | 324Lead |
| 308 | Total passes | 423Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 8 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |