Match statistics snapshot
- Angel City W fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Angel City W was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 10%).
- Angel City W held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 204 | Accurate passes | 347Lead |
| 313 | Total passes | 436Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.