Match statistics snapshot
- Houston Dash W fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Angel City W was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 21%).
- Houston Dash W held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 509Lead | Accurate passes | 212 |
| 609Lead | Total passes | 283 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Angel City W |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.