Match statistics snapshot
- Bay FC fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Houston Dash W was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 39%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 303 | Accurate passes | 311Lead |
| 392Lead | Total passes | 388 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Bay Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.