Match statistics snapshot
- NJ/NY Gotham FC W fired more attempts (19 vs 3 shots).
- Houston Dash W was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Nj/ny Gotham Fc W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target |
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Nj/ny Gotham Fc W |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 282 | Accurate passes | 308Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 394Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Nj/ny Gotham Fc W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Nj/ny Gotham Fc W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Nj/ny Gotham Fc W |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |