Match statistics snapshot
- North Carolina Courage W fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Houston Dash W was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 23%).
- North Carolina Courage W held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 196 | Accurate passes | 438Lead |
| 281 | Total passes | 522Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | North Carolina Courage W |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.