Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Louisville W fired more attempts (19 vs 12 shots).
- Racing Louisville W was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 33%).
- Houston Dash W held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 334Lead | Accurate passes | 229 |
| 416Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |