Match statistics snapshot
- San Diego Wave W fired more attempts (5 vs 1 shots).
- Houston Dash W was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 40%).
- Houston Dash W held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 0 | Shots inside the box | 2Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Total shots | 5Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 107Lead | Accurate passes | 103 |
| 130Lead | Total passes | 116 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dash W | Statistic | San Diego Wave W |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.