Match statistics snapshot
- Houston Dynamo created the clearer chances on xG (2.65 vs 1.54, Δ 1.11).
- Houston Dynamo fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 2.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.54 |
| Offsides | ||
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 459Lead | Accurate passes | 262 |
| 530Lead | Total passes | 319 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.44 | Goals prevented | -0.44 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.