Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Houston Dynamo was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 33%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 394Lead |
| 306 | Total passes | 471Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.