Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Houston Dynamo was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 20%).
- Houston Dynamo held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 355Lead | Accurate passes | 274 |
| 429Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.