Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Houston Dynamo was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 24%).
- Houston Dynamo held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 415Lead | Accurate passes | 358 |
| 483Lead | Total passes | 428 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.