Match statistics snapshot
- Houston Dynamo created the clearer chances on xG (1.18 vs 0.84, Δ 0.34).
- Houston Dynamo fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.18Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.84 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 310 | Accurate passes | 422Lead |
| 376 | Total passes | 515Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.24 | Goals prevented | -0.24 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.