Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Houston Dynamo was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 383 | Accurate passes | 444Lead |
| 460 | Total passes | 494Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.