Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (0.65 vs 1.73, Δ 1.08).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.73Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 375 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 457 | Total passes | 535Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.29 | Goals prevented | -0.29 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |