Match statistics snapshot
- Minnesota United FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.54 vs 1.70, Δ 0.16).
- Houston Dynamo fired more attempts (24 vs 8 shots).
- Minnesota United FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.54 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 541Lead | Accurate passes | 160 |
| 606Lead | Total passes | 238 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |