Match statistics snapshot
- Houston Dynamo created the clearer chances on xG (2.05 vs 0.19, Δ 1.86).
- Houston Dynamo fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Houston Dynamo was more accurate in front of goal (82% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.19 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 2 | Shots off target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 238 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.