Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Timbers created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 2.37, Δ 1.17).
- Houston Dynamo fired more attempts (19 vs 17 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.37Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 346 | Accurate passes | 386Lead |
| 408 | Total passes | 454Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -1.60 | Goals prevented | -1.60 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.