Match statistics snapshot
- Houston Dynamo created the clearer chances on xG (3.34 vs 0.68, Δ 2.66).
- Houston Dynamo fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Houston Dynamo was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 3.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| Offsides | ||
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 477Lead | Accurate passes | 359 |
| 531Lead | Total passes | 423 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.