Match statistics snapshot
- Houston Dynamo created the clearer chances on xG (0.47 vs 0.18, Δ 0.29).
- Houston Dynamo fired more attempts (15 vs 2 shots).
- San Jose Earthquakes was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 53%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 0.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.18 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 81%Lead | Ball possession | 19% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 678Lead | Accurate passes | 123 |
| 748Lead | Total passes | 174 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Houston Dynamo | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.