Match statistics snapshot
- Huddersfield created the clearer chances on xG (2.93 vs 1.98, Δ 0.95).
- Huddersfield fired more attempts (25 vs 7 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 2.93Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.98 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 436Lead | Accurate passes | 162 |
| 519Lead | Total passes | 268 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Huddersfield | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.